|
Post by flamesfan (Grizzlies) on Sept 11, 2018 2:10:38 GMT
Can we increase roster size to 13, plus 2 IR spots? It’s be nice to go a bit deeper into the player pool than we did last time. Then cap could go up to 90 mil maybe to make up for it.
|
|
|
Post by Miege22 (SONICS) on Sept 11, 2018 2:17:17 GMT
Can we increase roster size to 13, plus 2 IR spots? It’s be nice to go a bit deeper into the player pool than we did last time. Then cap could go up to 90 mil maybe to make up for it. I'm open to that if we cap the franchise limit at 16.
|
|
|
Post by Miege22 (SONICS) on Sept 11, 2018 2:18:52 GMT
You know what? Screw it. I'm good with 13 with 2 IR spots and a $90 mil salary cap. Real league is over $110 mil anyway.
I'll update the rules.
|
|
|
Post by flamesfan (Grizzlies) on Sept 11, 2018 2:19:14 GMT
Can we increase roster size to 13, plus 2 IR spots? It’s be nice to go a bit deeper into the player pool than we did last time. Then cap could go up to 90 mil maybe to make up for it. I'm open to that if we cap the franchise limit at 16. Or we could do 14 players per team for 20 teams. Just always thought 12 wasn’t enough players. Would 90 mil cap be too high?
|
|
|
Post by Miege22 (SONICS) on Sept 11, 2018 2:20:41 GMT
I like fewer than 14. Keep more players on the market for FA. I don't think $90 mil is too high a cap number.
|
|
|
Post by Miege22 (SONICS) on Sept 11, 2018 2:20:54 GMT
I'm going to move this conversation to League Motions.
|
|
|
Post by flamesfan (Grizzlies) on Sept 11, 2018 2:24:17 GMT
Maybe add a G League/Euro slot for the 14th so that 2nd rounders have some value?
|
|
|
Post by Miege22 (SONICS) on Sept 11, 2018 2:29:55 GMT
Hmm... I'm gonna leave that up for other owners to weigh in on.
|
|
|
Post by flamesfan (Grizzlies) on Sept 11, 2018 19:09:54 GMT
I think it’s necessary if we want 2nd rounders to hold any value at all. Most teams just cut their 2nd rounders in Pick and Roll because of a lack of space to stash them and still remain competitive
|
|
|
Post by Miege22 (SONICS) on Sept 11, 2018 19:17:29 GMT
I think it’s necessary if we want 2nd rounders to hold any value at all. Most teams just cut their 2nd rounders in Pick and Roll because of a lack of space to stash them and still remain competitive I'd be curious to see if that is actually an issue with 20 teams as opposed to 30. We could have a G-League spot where the player doesn't count against the roster limit (but does count against the salary cap), but isn't eligible to actually play on the ESPN site.
|
|
|
Post by flamesfan (Grizzlies) on Sept 11, 2018 19:33:26 GMT
I think it’s necessary if we want 2nd rounders to hold any value at all. Most teams just cut their 2nd rounders in Pick and Roll because of a lack of space to stash them and still remain competitive I'd be curious to see if that is actually an issue with 20 teams as opposed to 30. We could have a G-League spot where the player doesn't count against the roster limit (but does count against the salary cap), but isn't eligible to actually play on the ESPN site. That’s how I’d see it working as well
|
|
|
Post by Miege22 (SONICS) on Sept 11, 2018 19:46:01 GMT
I'm down for a G-League spot. How about we add it starting next summer?
|
|
|
Post by flamesfan (Grizzlies) on Sept 11, 2018 19:49:52 GMT
That works for me
|
|
|
Post by Kots (Hawks) on Sept 11, 2018 23:46:02 GMT
I'm down for a G-League spot. How about we add it starting next summer? Most definitely!!
|
|